More on Federal Transparency Efforts: FAQs Part 60 Provide Clarity

Background: The Federal Government has made significant efforts in bringing transparency to the healthcare market via the CMS Transparency in Coverage (TiC) Final Rule and the No Surprises Act (NSA) included in the CAA, 2021 legislation. Bolton first wrote about these efforts here.

The CMS TiC rule and the NSA are working in conjunction with each other to further the federal transparency efforts. While these efforts are largely expected to help consumers with healthcare spending, they do come with added administrative burden and complexity.

The agencies responsible for regulating the new federal transparency efforts have released clarifying FAQs which should help group health plans, providers and issuers to comply with the regulations.

Joint Agency FAQs

In FAQs Part 60, the Agencies addressed a few areas described below.

  1. The FAQs clarify that claims subject to the NSA (requiring the group health plans to apply cost-sharing for plan participants as if in-network) are subject to the ACA’s maximum out-of-pocket (MOOP) limitations, even if the services would otherwise be considered out-of-network.
  2. The FAQs clarify that any contractual arrangement with an air ambulance provider, direct or indirect, makes the air ambulance provider a “participating provider” for purposes of the NSA.
  3. The FAQs indicate that facility fees fall under the definition of “items and services” which are protected under the NSA (and subject to in-network cost-sharing) and must also be disclosed for cost comparison purposes under the TiC requirements (e.g., price transparency tools and any advanced explanation of benefits).

In addition to the FAQs, the Departments also included a statement making it clear that they’re aware and concerned that facility fees are being charged outside of hospital settings which results in increased costs.

The agencies report that “several states have taken or are considering taking action to prohibit, limit, or increase transparency around facility fees” and felt it was important to address that facility fees should be included for cost comparison purposes via the last Q&A.

 

Bolton will continue to monitor regulator guidance and offer meaningful, practical, timely information.

This article should not be considered as a substitute for legal, tax and/or actuarial advice. Contact the appropriate professional counsel for such matters. This article is not exhaustive and the content is subject to possible changes in applicable laws, rules, and regulations and their interpretations.


About Michelle Cammayo, Compliance National Practice Leader, Employee Benefits

Michelle Cammayo has close to 20 years of Employee Benefits experience specializing in all lines of health and welfare benefits. Today, Michelle works closely with clients and partners to provide guidance in areas of the law including ERISA, HIPAA, COBRA, FMLA and PPACA. She is also the IMA National Practice Leader for Compliance and endeavors to ensure IMA helps its clients manage and eliminate risk in the most effective manner. She is passionate about educating others and her passion for this shined in the COVID era where Michelle conducted weekly and then monthly webinars providing guidance to employers. Her podcast, Cammayo’s Compliance Talk, has gained popularity in the last three years to become a favorite amongst our clients. She also contributes regularly to our Blog and has authored several articles for industry-related newsletters. Michelle’s consultative approach with employers provides practical advice as employers endeavor to be compliant.

Subscribe to the Bolton Blog